By Gary D. Barnett February 21, 2020 Lewrockwell.com

Those that prevent disease and expose virus creation are heroic, but those that create and purposely spread disease and virus are inhuman. Given the history of the United States government and its military industrial complex concerning biological and germ warfare, the use of these agents against large populations, and the desire to create agents that are race specific strains, these powerful entities have become compassionless purveyors of death to the innocent. Manmade viruses meant for warfare, whether for economic destruction, starvation, or mass death, are the workings of the truly evil among us. Predation at this level is relegated to those in power; a president for example, could give the order to wipe out millions due to his inability to control a problem he caused and perpetuated, and then lay blame on the victims.

Who would ever have believed that modern warfare could be more brutal, more torturous, more painful, and more harmful to innocents, especially children, than past atrocities committed in war. Memories of millions sent to their deaths fighting in trenches, cities obliterated by atomic bombs, entire countries destroyed, and millions purposely left to starve in order to appease some tyrant or elected “leader.” I once thought that nuclear war would signal the end of life as we know it, but considering modern warfare and technology, I now think that uncontrolled and deadly viruses may consume the world population, as one after another poisons are released as acts of hidden war. There can be no end to this madness, as any retaliation in kind will result in the spread of worldwide disease; all created by man.

The new Coronavirus, (2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) one in a line of many that were not just likely but most certainly produced by man in laboratories, is affecting almost exclusively the Chinese at this point. This has seemingly opened the floodgates to speculation as to its exact origin. This virus has unique characteristics that have happened before with SARS and MERS, and has genetic material that has never been identified, and is not tied to any animal or human known virus. This should be troubling to all, because if this is manmade, it was manufactured as a weapon of war. So who is responsible for its release in China? It is possible that this virus was created in China and was “accidentally” released into the population, but that does not sound credible at any level. Do any think that the Chinese government would create a Chinese race specific virus and release it in their country?

Interestingly, in the past, U.S. universities and NGOs went to China specifically to do illegal biological experimentation, and this was so egregious to Chinese officials, that forcible removal of these people was the result. Harvard University, one of the major players in this scandal, stole the DNA samples of hundreds of thousands of Chinese citizens, left China with those samples, and continued illegal bio-research in the U.S. It is thought that the U.S. military, which puts a completely different spin on the conversation, had commissioned the research in China at the time. This is more than suspicious.

The U.S. has, according to this article at Global Research, had a massive biological warfare program since at least the early 1940s, but has used toxic agents against this country and others since the 1860s. This is no secret, regardless of the propaganda spread by the government and its partners in criminal bio-weapon research and production.

As of 1999, the U.S. government had deployed its Chemical and Biological Weapons (CBW) arsenal against the Philippines, Puerto Rico, Vietnam, China, North Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Cuba, Haitian boat people, and our neighbor Canada according to this article at Counter Punch. Of course, U.S. citizens have been used as guinea pigs many times as well, and exposed to toxic germ agents and deadly chemicals by government. Keep in mind that this is a short list, as the U.S. is well known for also using proxies to spread its toxic chemicals and germ agents, such as happened in Iraq and Syria. Since 1999 there have been continued incidences of several different viruses, most of which are presumed to be manmade, including the current Coronavirus that is affecting China today.

There is also much evidence of the research and development of race-specific bio-warfare agents. This is very troubling. One would think, given the idiotic race arguments by post-modern Marxists, that this would consume the mainstream news, and any participants in these atrocious race-specific poisons would be outed at every level. That is not happening, but I believe it is due to obvious reasons, including government cover-up, hypocrisy at all levels, and leftist agenda driven objectives that would not gain ground with the exposure of this government-funded anti-race science.

I will say that it is not just the U.S. that is developing and producing bio-warfare agents and viruses, but many developed countries around the globe do so as well. But the United States, as is the case in every area of war and killing, is by far the world leader in its inhuman desire to be able to kill entire populations through biological and chemical warfare means. Because these agents are extremely dangerous and uncontrollable, and can spread wildly, the risk to not only isolated populations, but also the entire world is evident. Consider that a deadly virus created by the U.S. and used against another country was found out and verified, and in retaliation, that country or others decided to strike back with other toxic agents against America. Where would this end, and over time, how many billions could be affected in such a scenario?

All indications point to the fact that the most toxic, poisonous, and deadly viruses ever known are being created in labs around the world. In the U.S. think of Fort Detrick, Maryland, Pine Bluff Arsenal, Arkansas, Horn Island, Mississippi, Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, Vigo Ordinance Plant, Indiana, and many others. Think of the fascist partnerships between this government and the pharmaceutical industry. Think of the U.S. military installations positioned all around the globe. Nothing good can come from this, as it is not about finding cures for disease, or about discovering vaccines, but is done for one reason only, and that is for the purpose of bio-warfare for mass killing.

The drive to find biological weapons that will sicken and kill millions at a time is not only a travesty, but is beyond evil. This power is held by the few, but the potential victims of this madness include everyone on earth. How can such insanity at this level be allowed to continue? If any issue could ever unite the masses, governments participating in biological and germ warfare, race-specific killing, and creating viruses with the potential to affect disease and death worldwide, should cause many to stand together against it. The first step is to expose that governments, the most likely culprit being the U.S. government, are planting these viruses purposely to cause great harm. Once that is proven, the unbelievable risk to all will be known, and then people everywhere should put their divisiveness aside, stand together, and stop this assault on mankind.

“In vast laboratories in the Ministry of Peace, and in experimental stations, teams of experts are indefatigably at work searching for new and deadlier gases; or for soluble poisons capable of being produced in such quantities as to destroy the vegetation of whole continents; or for breeds of disease germs immunised against all possible antibodies.” ~ George Orwell – 1984

Additional notes: here, here, here, here, here and here.

More Scientists Say
SARS Is A BioWeapon
News24.com – South Africa
4-12-3

Moscow: The deadly pneumonia that has killed more than 100 people around the world may be a man-made biological weapon, Russian experts said on Friday.   Nikolai Filatov, head of Moscow’s epidemiological services, told the Gazeta daily that he thought the pneumonia was man-made because “there is no vaccine for this virus, its make-up is unclear, it has not been very widespread and the population is not immune to it.”   Yet he had some reservations, since the virus has a low mortality rate – so far killing 4% of those infected -, and because it is relatively difficult to pass on – through direct contact or inhalation.   The virus, according to academy of medecine member Sergei Kolesnikov, is a cocktail of mumps and measles, whose mix could never appear in nature.   “We can only get that in a laboratory,” he told a conference in the Siberian city of Irkutsk, quoted by RIA Novosti news agency.   It may have spread because of an “accidental leak” from a lab, he added.   More than 100 people have died and some 3 000 others have been infected by Severe acute respiratory syndrome (Sars), which is believed to have originated in China’s southern Guangdong province.   http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1346560,00.html

Rigged Science & Man Made AIDS

AIDS_CENSORSHIP_BANNER

Rigged Science & Man Made AIDS

by

Alan R Cantwell, M.D.

12-12-16

AIDS experts and the mainstream media have tried hard to convince us that gay men started the epidemic in the U.S. and that it originated in sub-Saharan Africa among black heterosexuals. AIDS is a blood-borne and sexually-transmitted disease (STD) caused by HIV (the human immunodeficiency virus). However, never adequately explained is how a black African heterosexual epidemic could have segued into a mostly white homosexual epidemic in Manhattan, New York City beginning in 1979 —at a time when there was no epidemic in Africa. In reality, there is little hard evidence to prove that the American epidemic came from Africa, or even from Haiti, as a few molecular biologists have claimed.

http://www.whale.to/v/cc.jpg

So how did AIDS start exclusively in young, healthy, primarily white and well-educated homosexuals in Manhattan? My research suggests HIV entered the gay population via an experimental hepatitis B vaccine contaminated by a chimpanzee virus. This vaccine was administered to gay men in preliminary trials shortly before (1976-1977) and during the actual hepatitis B experiment (1978-1980) at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan. This was closely followed by the “gay plague” of AIDS.

To better understand the man made AIDS, it is essential to know what some virologists were doing in the 1970s, the decade before the outbreak. This included unethical research performed on unsuspecting people, such as covert vaccine and cold war radiation experiments. In addition, forced transfer of deadly viruses between animal species held captive in laboratories, and the development of cancer and AIDS-like immunosuppressive viruses were commonplace as part of the “War on Cancer” (1968-1980).

The myth of Patient Zero who brought AIDS to America

In October 2016 the mainstream media finally exonerated Patient Zero, the Canadian airline steward accused of bringing AIDS to America. Gaetan Dugas, his real name, developed swollen lymph glands in 1979. Diagnosed with Kaposi’s sarcoma (the so-called “gay cancer” of AIDS) in New York City in 1980, he died of kidney failure in 1984 at age 31. He was made famous posthumously by the 1987 publication of Randy Shilts’s  And the Band Played On, an essential early history of AIDS, in which Dugas appeared as a minor character. Shilts theorized Dugas brought AIDS from Paris to New York and the media widely sensationalized the story. TIME magazine referred to ‘the appalling saga of patient zero’; The New York Post headlined, ‘The man who gave us AIDS—triggered gay cancer in the U.S.’ Even the AMA American Medical News declared Dugas “may have brought AIDS to the U.S.” In truth, it has been known for a long time that the Patient Zero scenario was a literary publicity ploy concocted to sell more copies of Shilts’s book, which quickly became an international best-seller and later an HBO made-for-TV movie.

The New York Times (October 26, 2016), which has always avoided serious discussion of the man-made theory of AIDS, headlined ‘HIV arrived in the U.S. long before Patient Zero.’ Dugas was vindicated by computer calculations made by molecular biologists using genetic sequences from the earliest blood specimens of HIV-positive gay men stored at the New York Blood Center in 1978-1979. The biologists concluded that HIV spread from Zaire, Africa, to Haiti in 1967 and then to New York City around 1971.

Other molecular biologists studying the genes of HIV estimate the virus entered the African population sometime between 1915 and 1941. Airplanes fly in and out of Central Africa carrying people and their STDs (and primates) around the world. Yet we are led to believe that HIV supposedly travelled to only three geographic areas over a period of a half-century or more. The dictionary defines “epidemic” as tending to affect many people within a population. There can be no epidemic without a large number of cases. There are no stored blood specimens in the U.S that test positive for HIV before 1978, and no epidemic cases. And there is no real evidence of an African AIDS epidemic until the Fall of 1982 at the earliest, according to Luc Montagnier, the co-discoverer of HIV.

Is the out-of-Africa theory another AIDS myth?

When HIV was co-discovered in 1984 by Robert Gallo, he theorized the virus likely originated from the African green monkey in the bush. Later, HIV was found to be most closely related to a chimpanzee virus called simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). AIDS experts also promote the “cut hunter theory” whereby the chimp virus “jumped species” into humans who ate chimp meat or who got chimp blood into cuts or wounds during slaughter. Not everyone agrees. Primatologist Preston Marx believes a person cannot contract AIDS from a monkey or a chimp in that way.

Secret and unethical human experiments in the pre-AIDS era

Unfortunately, doctors have a long and sordid history of unethical experimentation, much of it never reported or publicized in medical journals for obvious reasons. Mention must be made of the horrific Guatemala experiments (1946-1948) conducted, in part, by the U.S. Public Health Service (now the CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The study came to light, quite by accident , in 2010. Over 5,500 people, including children, were recruited and 1,300 were deliberately infected with various STDs by doctors. The Wikipedia has the gory details. Critics, who quickly dismiss man made AIDS because “doctors would never do that,” need to be aware of this shameful reality.

In 1972, a few years before the gay experiment, the government’s notorious Tuskegee syphilis experiment , which began in 1932, was finally abandoned by the CDC under public pressure. Black sharecroppers with syphilis were deliberately not treated with antibiotics so that doctors could study the natural progression of the disease until death.

In 1971, the military’s biological warfare research merged with respectable cancer research. The biological warfare research program at Fort Detrick, Maryland, is now part of the National Cancer Institute, which is part of the NIH. Thus, bio-warfare research at the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research can go under cover of legitimate cancer research.

Unethical hepatitis research in the 70s involved instances like feeding chocolate milk laced with human feces to deliberately infect mentally retarded children with hepatitis. Saul Krugman, considered a scientific icon for his hepatitis discoveries in the Willowbrook experiments, was also condemned by some as a monster for deliberately infecting kids without consent. A few years later, Krugman was made “safety officer” with access to vaccine vials given to the gay men at the NYBC.

It was not uncommon in the 70s to test various vaccines on retarded children and black Africans. Laboratory chimpanzees were infected with hepatitis B by intravenous injections of human saliva and semen. In 1974 the NYBC established Vilab II, a rarely-mentioned chimpanzee center in Liberia, Africa, used to infect primates and to use them to develop hepatitis vaccines for eventual human use. Vilab has recently been disbanded.

The Special Cancer Virus Program (1968-1980) that preceded AIDS

dr-horowitz-emerging-viruses-book

The Special Cancer Virus Program, under the direction of the NIH, was initiated by president Nixon as part of his War on Cancer. The program involved the leading virologists and medical research institutions in America. Its purpose was to prove that certain animal viruses could cause human cancer. This required the dangerous transfer of viruses between animal species, as well as adapting these viruses into human cells. In the laboratory process, numerous AIDS-like retroviruses were created. The annual reports of the SVCP repeatedly state that animal-derived “human candidate viruses” would not be tested in humans.

This genetic engineering of viruses was largely kept hidden from the public, as well as the ease with which these animal viruses (particularly primate viruses) could mysteriously contaminate laboratories and go unrecognized. For example, Gallo, a Project Officer in the Program, reported a discovery in 1975 of a “new” and “human” HL-23 virus which eventually proved to be three different contaminating ape viruses (gibbon ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus). Gallo claimed he had no idea how these primate viruses contaminated his laboratory. Veterinarian Max (Myron) Essex of Harvard , another leading AIDS expert, was also deceived in 1986 when he reported a “second” AIDS virus, which proved to be a contaminant monkey virus traced, not to Africa, but to his own laboratory.

By 1978, the year the trial in gays began, the SCVP had produced 37,438 liters of animal retrovirus material ready for lab experimentation (The Virus Cancer Program, June 1978, p 282). By 1980, the Program was disbanded because of its failure to prove that an animal virus could cause human cancer. By the end of the 1970s, homosexuals began to sicken and die due to a “new” and unprecedented immunosuppressive and cancer-causing virus. Discovered in 1984 and quickly dubbed the “human” immunodeficiency virus, it made Gallo the most famous scientist in the world—and brought riches to Big Pharma, the virologists, and the AIDS establishment. All because a chimp virus was mysteriously “introduced” into the bodies of male homosexuals in Manhattan at the NYBC.

Gay men, chimps, and the hepatitis B vaccine experiment (1978-1980)

As early as 1975, Manhattan gays began donating blood specimens for the vaccine trial. Eventually 13,000 specimens were donated. All of it was retained at the NYBC, and when a blood test later became available for HIV, the blood was re-tested to trace the introduction and spread of HIV into the gay community beginning in 1978-1979. The hepatitis B vaccine was developed by Maurice Hilleman and manufactured by Merck. Hilleman, the world’s leading vaccine developer, was well aware that the absolute safety of any vaccine could only be proven by testing it in humans. Obviously, HIV was unknown in the 1970s so there was no test for it. By the mid-1970s, prior to the actual trial in 1978, the vaccine was developed and tested in chimpanzees. A preliminary vaccine was tested in pilot studies, and inoculated into several dozen Merck executives, and a small group of homosexuals.

Did a chimp immunodeficiency virus contaminate the vaccine? This question is not idle speculation or conspiracy theory. An essential source of information on the trial is contained in June Goodfield’s Quest for the Killers (1985). She writes, “Was something wrong with the vaccine, possibly contamination? This was no theoretic fear, contamination having been suspected in one vaccine batch made by the National Institutes of Health, though never in Merck’s.”

More frightening is Paul Offit’s admission in Vaccine (2007). Offit, a leading spokesperson for the vaccine industry, states that Hilleman “would be the first and last to use human blood to make a vaccine. He didn’t know until later that the blood was heavily contaminated with HIV” (p 115, emphasis mine). The author does not explain how HIV could have “heavily contaminated” the vaccine made from the pooled blood of gay men in 1976-1977, when there were no AIDS cases and no evidence of HIV anywhere in the stored blood specimens in the U.S. Offit tries to reassure us: “Although HIV was likely present in the blood from which he had made his early preparations of his vaccine, Maurice Hilleman’s choice of pepsin, urea, and formaldehyde had completely destroyed it.” Nevertheless, medical professionals did not trust the safety of the vaccine when it came on the market in 1982, no matter what Offit claims.

Leonard G Horowitz, author of  Emerging Viruses,: AIDS & Ebola: Nature, Accident, or Intentional? (1996), explores the many factors, including the role of the military-medical- industrial complex, that convinces him that AIDS is man-made. He exposes the little-known hepatitis B vaccine pilot studies in chimps and gays in the few years preceding the large-scale trial in 1978. Horowitz theorizes: “A few military scientists, I realized, were all that was needed to transport a vial of viruses from Fort Detrick or for that matter Gallo’s lab, to Hilleman’s hepatitis B vaccine lab in West Point, Pennsylvania, or directly to Krugman’s group in New York. The African supplies could have been easily tainted the same way.” For more details, Google: Leonard G Horowitz + the earliest hepatitis B vaccines and the origin of AIDS.

The final experiment, which eventually enrolled 1,083 volunteers, began in November 1978 and ended in June 1980 at the NYBC. Half the men received the vaccine; the other half a placebo. Each man was given 3 doses of vaccines over a period of six months; and 6,332 follow-up visits and blood samples were also required. Each man had a special vaccine vial used only for him. At the end of the trial, the placebo group was offered the protective vaccine. A full history of the hepatitis B vaccine and its success can be found in the Wikipedia.

The aftermath of the gay hepatitis B experiment

Screen Shot 2017-05-04 at 10.24.22 AM

The entrance point of HIV/AIDS into the U.S. population clearly traces back to the experiment at the NYBC. There is no question that signing up for the trial was deadly for some gay men. The proof is contained in a 1986 follow-up report of 378 men who donated blood and/or were volunteers for the experiment (JAMA 1986;255:2167-2172). Authored by Cladd Stevens et al and entitled ‘Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III [HIV] infection in a cohort of homosexual men in New York City’, it is the strongest evidence, in my view, that the men were damaged by HIV, the chimp virus in humans.

In 1978-1979 over 6% of the men were already “positive” for HIV. In 1980, the year Dugas was diagnosed with AIDS, 15% of the gays were positive. By 1982, as many as 30% were infected. By 1984, the year HIV was discovered, 43% of the men tested positive. To this day, this is the highest HIV infection rate anywhere in the world. (Swaziland, Africa, currently has a rate of 28.8%.) For reasons unexplained, men in the study who had already been diagnosed with AIDS were omitted from this study.

After the AIDS epidemic became official in 1981, the CDC tried to reassure the public about the vaccine’s safety with little success. In this regard, a  JAMA editor reported: “HB vaccine acceptance has been seriously hindered by the fear of possible AIDS transmission from the vaccine.” The experimental vaccine given to gays in additional trials in San Francisco and Denver was tested and declared free of HIV. However, vials of vaccines (made by Merck and the NIH) were never tested from the Manhattan group at the NYBC.

It is important to remember that HIV is not the first time a primate virus “jumped species” to enter the human population. This transfer did not originate in Africa. It occurred when a cancer-causing primate virus (simian virus 40) contaminated the polio vaccines of the 1950s and ‘60s and infected half the U.S. population of that time. Some current researchers say SV40 causes human cancer. Government scientists say it doesn’t. More information can be found on sv40Foundation.org.

Is is merely a coincidence that when large numbers of gays first come out of the closet and signed up for the government’s vaccine studies, an epidemic of mysterious origin would erupt in this most hated minority in America? An STD that attacked only homosexuals? A coincidence that the hepatitis B vaccine was developed and tested in chimpanzees and that a chimp virus is the most closely related virus to HIV, the cause of AIDS? A coincidence that the demographic group selected for the gay experiment at the Center was quickly followed by an epidemic in Manhattan that initially occurred exclusively among the same demographic (young, white, healthy, promiscuous, well-educated, and mostly professional homosexuals)?

Thirty-nine million people worldwide have died of man made AIDS; and 38 million are currently infected. Should we blame gay sex for bringing a chimp virus to America? Should we blame Africans for an epidemic that clearly started first in Manhattan? Should we blame monkeys and chimps in the bush when we hold them captive in primate labs and pump them full of cancerous viruses and cancerous tissue— and then use them to develop vaccines for human use?

Is the “science” surrounding the origin of HIV/AIDS rigged by the refusal of the AIDS establishment to seriously consider any evidence for the man-made theory of AIDS? Or are the green monkey and the cut hunter theories of AIDS—and the now defunct Patient Zero story— merely more mainstream media “fake news”?

————————————-

Alan Cantwell is a retired dermatologist and cancer researcher. He is the author of AIDS and the Doctors of Death; An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic, and Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot, both available from Amazon.com.

His various articles on man made AIDS are posted on the Net. Google: Alan Cantwell + man made AIDS.