Meet Noam Chomsky, Academic Gatekeeper


Audio Player

Is Noam Chomsky an anarcho-syndicalist or proponent of the Federal Reserve? A fearless political crusader or defender of the Warren Commission JFK orthodoxy? A tireless campaigner for justice or someone who doesn’t care who did 9/11? Join us this week on The Corbett Report as we examine some of the subjects that Chomsky would prefer you didn’t think about.

For those with limited bandwidth, CLICK HERE to download a smaller, lower file size version of this episode.

For those interested in audio quality, CLICK HERE for the highest-quality version of this episode (WARNING: very large download).


Steven Pinker on Noam Chomsky
Time Reference: 02:54


Chomsky: Obama Worse Than Bush
Time Reference: 03:13


‘Drone strikes a terror-generating machine’
Time Reference: 10:02


Noam Chomsky to RT: Bush torturer, Obama just kills
Time Reference: 10:48


Chomsky On Obama’s Election Campaign
Time Reference: 11:05


Chomsky on US Foreign Policy
Time Reference: 11:33


Manufacturing Consent – Noam Chomsky and the Media
Time Reference: 14:54


Noam Chomsky Loves the Federal Reserve
Time Reference: 19:13


Noam Chomsky and the JFK Assassination
Time Reference: 26:43


Deep Politics and the Death of JFK
Time Reference: 35:24


JFK and the Unspeakable
Time Reference: 35:48


Noam Chomsky discusses 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists
Time Reference: 38:25


Chomsky on 9/11: “Who cares?”
Time Reference: 42:52


Truth in the Academy?
Time Reference: 47:28


Time Reference: 47:37


After Multiple Denials, CIA Admits to Snooping on Noam Chomsky
Time Reference: 54:34


Rethinking Noam Chomsky
Time Reference: 55:48


Reggae Noam Chomsky Classical Old Skool Hip Hop Groove – Oh YES
Time Reference: 35:48


Filed in: EpisodesPodcasts
Tagged with:

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Richard-Fitzwell says:

    Hey don’t forget that time that Noam decided he would accept fascism to save the world from global warming:

    “Well, if wait for an ecological disaster, it’ll be too late–in fact, we might not even have such a long wait.

    Look, it’s certainly true that as the threats mount, it may energize people–but you don’t wait for that to happen: first you have to prepare the ground. For example, suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse effects has been way underestimated, and that the catastrophic effects are actually going to set in 10 years from now, and not 100 years from now or something. Well, given the state of the popular movements we have today, we’d probably have a fascist takeover–with everybody agreeing to it, because that would be the only method for survival that anyone could think of. I’d even agree to it, because there’s just no other alternatives right now.

    *emphasis mine.

    Excerpt from ‘Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky’, pg. 388
    (c) 2002 by Noam Chomsky, Peter Rounds Mitchell, and John Schoeffel

  2. BuddhaForce says:

    Noam Chomsky: Trump false-flag a “possibility”

    I thought he didn’t care about false-flags? Telegraphing or capitalizing on fear and hatred?

    • mkey says:

      I find it incredible he’d go so close to talking about false flag attacks and yet he said nothing. What, no obvious examples from recent history sprang to mind?