Hãy cứ cho rằng “khủng bố Hồi Giáo” là thủ phạm, và rằng một “nữ khủng bố” ôm bom tự sát là “có thật”.. Những câu hỏi cần đặt ra:

1- Mục tiêu của “khủng bố Hồi giáo” là giết những kẻ gây họa cho họ.. Nghĩa là những tên lãnh đạo Âu Mỹ chủ trương chính sách..Nhưng “khủng bố” chỉ giết dân và tự sát trong khi bọn “lãnh đạo như tổng thống Pháp ngồi xem bóng đá khơi khơi thì khủng bố chẳng thèm tấn công? Những tên đầu xỏ tội ác quan chức Âu Mỹ không hề bị đe dọa giết hại..?

“Tên khủng bố” Phạm Hồng Thái còn biết tạo kế hoạch tấn công bọn lãnh đạo kẻ thù như tên toàn quyền Merlin và giới thượng lưu đầu xỏ của hệ thống thù địch…Thế mà khủng bố Hồi giáo “tài giỏi” từng tổ chức được 911, và hiện nay “chiếm cứ” Thánh Quốc với đầy đủ kỹ thuật cao cấp điện toán, vũ khí v.v gây “khốn đốn” cho 10 quốc gia Âu Mỹ và Trung Đông lại KHÔNG HỀ có kế hoạch nỗ lực giết những tên đầu xỏ Âu Mỹ hoặc ít nhất những tên tay sai quan chức và gia đình những tên này?

Ông Paul Craig Roberts cho rằng chỉ có những “cái đầu đầy cứt” (dumbshit) mới tin rằng những người chạy loạn chiến tranh từ Syria phải “cần” làm sổ thông hành (passport) và đem theo? chưa cần nói là ai cấp? Theo thông báo chính thức “trong nhóm khủng bố” không có ai là người Syrian hết!

Sự kiện lạ đời nhất là cả một hội trường lớn, sân vận động quốc gia với biết bao nhiều máy thu hình an ninh đặt khắp nơi, cùng với hàng ngàn, hàng chục ngàn khán giả tham dự trong thời kỷ ĐIỆN THOẠI DI ĐỘNG CHỤP HÌNH ĐỦ TRÒ v.v mà cho đến nay KHÔNG CÓ MỘT HÌNH ẢNH NÀO ghi nhận “diễn biến và bóng dáng, nhân dạng những tên khủng bố tại hiện trường được trưng ra?!?

Quốc hội Pháp sẽ phê chuẩn sắc luật “3 tháng tình trạng khẩn cấp quân luật” – dân  không được biểu tình- cảnh sát an ninh có quyền ruồng bố, bắt giam và bắn hạ nghi can không cần trát tòa!

Tên tổng thống Pháp đưa ra dự trù sửa Hiến pháp để có quyền TƯỚC QUYỀN CÔNG DÂN bất cứ ai tình nghi có gian díu hoặc ủng hộ khủng bố!!!

Dân quyền coi như đình chỉ!!!

Bọn Nhà nước Úc “ăn ké” ra sắc luật cho phép cảnh sát bắn nghi can ngay hiện trường!!!

Pháp đi tiên phong trong kế hoạch cảnh sát trị Âu Châu theo bài bản kế hoạch được khởi đầu từ 911!
Mỹ cần 911, Pháp và Âu Châu sẽ không chỉ cần đến cả hai (2) sự kiện Charlie Hebdo và sáu vụ nổ, đấu súng tại Paris để tước dân quyền mà sẽ còn nữa…vì “lòng dân Âu Châu” vẫn chưa ngả!

Nhân Chủ

==========

More Paris Puzzles — Paul Craig Roberts

More Paris Puzzles

Paul Craig Roberts
Some people who are not inclined to believe the official story of the Paris attack are troubled by the question why Muslim suicide bombers would blow themselves up for a false flag attack. The answer to this question is very simple. But first we should dispose of the question whether suicide bombers did blow themselves up. Is this something that we know, or is it part of the story that we are told? For example, we were told that during 9/11 passengers in hijacked airliners used their cell phones to call relatives, but experts have testified that the technology of the time did not permit cell phone calls from airliners at those altitudes.
To dispose of the question whether we have or do not have any real evidence that suicide bombers blew themselves up, I will assume that they did.
So we have suicide bombers blowing themselves up.
Now turn to the question that troubles some doubters: Why would suicide bombers blow themselves up for the sake of a false flag attack?
As I said, the answer is simple: Why assume that the suicide bombers knew who was organizing the attack? There seems to be abundant evidence that ISIL is a US creation, one that is still dependent on US active or passive support—thus the conflict between Putin and Washington over attacking ISIL. ISIL seems to be what Washington used to overthrow the government in Libya and afterward was sent by Washington to Syria to overthrow Assad. Obviously, Washington has ISIL infiltrated. Washington has long proven is ability to use Islamic extremists. As Washington used them in Afghanistan against the Soviets and in Libya and Syria against independent governments, Washington used them in Paris. By my last count, the FBI on 150 occasions has successfully deceived people into participating into FBI orchestrated “terror plots.”
Now let us move to some bigger questions. Why do terrorists attack ordinary innocent people who have neither awareness of “their” government’s actions or control over them? The victims of 9/11 were not the neocons and members of the Washington establishment, whose policies in the Middle East justified attacks on their persons. Ditto for the Boston Marathon Bombing, and ditto for the Paris attacks. Innocents were the victims, not those who have taken Muslim lives.
Historically, terror attacks are not on the innocent but on the rulers and those who are guilty. For example, it was the Archduke of Austria/Hungary who was assassinated by the Serbian terrorist, not ordinary people blown up or shot down in a street cafe.
It is interesting that terrorists attacks attributed to Muslims only fall upon ordinary people, not upon the political elites who oppress the Muslims. In past years on several occasions I have remarked in my columns on the total vulnerability of the neoconservatives to assassination. Yet there has been not a single attack by terrortists on a neocon life, and the neocons are the source of the violence that Washington has unleashed on the Muslim world. The neocons walk around without threat free as birds.
How believeable is it that Muslim terrorists take their ire out on innocents when the President of France himself, who has sent military forces to murder Muslims, was sitting in the attacked stadium and could easily have been eliminated by a suicide bomber?
Now let us turn to questions of identification of the alleged “Paris terrorists.” Is it realistic to suppose that the millions of refugees from Washington and its European vassals’ wars in the Middle East have passports? Were these millions of refugees expecting to be driven by White Civilization’s Bombs out of their countries and thus had prepared themselves with passports in order to flee?
Did they write on their passport applications that they were going to be visiting Europe?
Was the beleaguered country, their homeland, under full military assault, able to process all these millions of passports?
What sort of dumbshit Western media goes along with the passport story — a media well paid to lie for Washington’s hegemony and crimes?
One final question for skeptics. Where are the photographs of the terrorists during their terrorizing? Surrounding the scenes of violence there were not only abundant security cameras, but also hundreds, even thousands, of people with cell phones that have cameras. With all of these photos, how is it possible that the authorities do not know if some terrorists escaped, and if so, who they are and what they look like? Why are the authorities relying on fake passports for photos of the terrorists?
Terrorism has been unleashed in the Western World, and it is the terrorism of Western governments against Western peoples.

 

Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West and How America Was Lost

Five Myths Regarding the Paris Terror Attacks

 631

 33 2

 704

French soldiers at the Eiffel Tower after the Paris shootings. Photo: Reuters
As usual, the politicos and talking heads are all talking their own book, using the Paris terror attacks to push their own agendas.
As shown below, they’re spouting nonsense.
Mass Surveillance Won’t Help
The NSA and other spy agencies are pretending that the Paris attacks show that we need more mass surveillance.
But the New York Times correctly points out in a scathing editorial that mass surveillance won’t help to prevent terrorism:
As one French counterterrorism expert and former defense official said, this shows that “our intelligence is actually pretty good, but our ability to act on it is limited by the sheer numbers.” In other words, the problem in this case was not a lack of data, but a failure to act on information authorities already had.
In fact, indiscriminate bulk data sweeps have not been useful. In the more than two years since the N.S.A.’s data collection programs became known to the public, the intelligence community has failed to show that the phone program has thwarted a terrorist attack. Yet for years intelligence officials and members of Congress repeatedly misled the public by claiming that it was effective.
In reality, top security experts agree that mass surveillance makes us MORE vulnerable to terrorists.
Indeed, even the NSA has previously admitted that it’s collecting too MUCH information to stop terror attacks.
Encryption Isn’t What Made Us Vulnerable
The spy agencies are also pretending that encryption made it impossible to stop the attacks.
But Tech Dirt notes:

Most of the communications between the attackers was conducted via unencrypted vanilla SMS:

“…News emerging from Paris — as well as evidence from a Belgian ISIS raid in January — suggests that the ISIS terror networks involved were communicating in the clear, and that the data on their smartphones was not encrypted.
European media outlets are reporting that the location of a raid conducted on a suspected safe house Wednesday morning was extracted from a cellphone, apparently belonging to one of the attackers, found in the trash outside the Bataclan concert hall massacre. Le Monde reported that investigators were able to access the data on the phone, including a detailed map of the concert hall and an SMS messaging saying “we’re off; we’re starting.” Police were also able to trace the phone’s movements.

The reports note that Abdelhamid Abaaoud, the “mastermind” of both the Paris attacks and a thwarted Belgium attack ten months ago, failed to use any encryption whatsoever (read: existing capabilities stopped the Belgium attacks and could have stopped the Paris attacks, but didn’t). That’s of course not to say batshit religious cults like ISIS don’t use encryption, and won’t do so going forward. Everybody uses encryption. But the point remains that to use a tragedy to vilify encryption, push for surveillance expansion, and pass backdoor laws that will make everybody less safe — is nearly as gruesome as the attacks themselves.

7 of the 8 Terrorists Were Known to U.S. or French Intelligence Agencies
Just as with 9/11, the Boston marathon bombings, and other recent attacks, governments are pretending “it wasn’t foreseeable”.
But CBS reports that law enforcement sources say that 7 of the 8 terrorists were known in advance to U.S. or French intelligence services.
The New York Times confirms:

Most of the men who carried out the Paris attacks were already on the radar of intelligence officials in France and Belgium, where several of the attackers lived only hundreds of yards from the main police station, in a neighborhood known as a haven for extremists.

Escalating War Against ISIS Is Not the Only Option
I’m all for killing members of ISIS.
But given that the U.S. and its close allies – Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar and Bahrain – are massively supporting ISIS, stopping the arming, feeding and logistical support is even more important if we want to stop these crazies.
None of the Terrorists Were Syrian
None of the Paris terrorists were Syrian. All of them were European nationals.
The German Interior Minister suggests that the Syrian passport found at the scene of the terror attacks was a “false flag” by ISIS meant to force countries to seal their borders against further refugees.
Why would they do this? Numerous security experts suggest that refugees fleeing ISIS’ “Caliphate” is a PR disaster for ISIS. After all, happy fundamentalist Muslims wouldn’t flee utopia, would they?
But we do take the risk of infiltration of refugee groups by terrorists very seriously. Indeed, the Telegraph reports today:

The mastermind of the Paris attacks was able to slip into Europe among Syrian migrants, it emerged last night, as police on the continent admitted they are unable to monitor thousands of suspected jihadists.
***
It has emerged that Abaaoud, and at least two of the Paris terrorists took the migrant route via Greece, intensifying fears that terrorists are able easily to exploit the refugee crisis to get to Europe.

Specifically, many of the Paris terrorists were European nationals who went to fight for ISIS in Syria, and then they slipped in with the refugees coming from Syria to get back into Europe.
So those saying that the civilians fleeing war and mayham in Syria are all terrorists are wrong … but so are those saying that the massive refugee flow poses no danger.