Về Cái Gọi Là “Cẩm Nang Phi Quyền Chính”: Một Trò Ném Đá Dấu tay của An Ninh Định Chế Nhà Nước và những kẻ lưu manh láu cá vặt!


Một trong những nỗ lực BÔI NHỌ phong trào nguyên lý phi quyền chính của tập đoàn an ninh nhà nước và các nhóm tay sai trong những thập niên qua không chỉ là kéo dài “trò phù thủy ngôn ngữ” đồng hóa phi quyền chính (anarchy) với hỗn loạn (Chaos) mà chúng còn trưng dụng những tên mượn danh phi quyền chính để đẻ ra những “tác phẩm”, “bài viết” và … “cẩm nang”… và nhất là những nhóm người nô lệ cho chủ nghĩa quốc gia nhà nước, chủ nghĩa dân tộc, chẳng hạn như đám tàn dư ngụy ngục, mượn những “cẩm nang” này một cách lưu manh, láu cá vặt vãnh nhằm mục tiêu đánh lận con đen trò “chống cộng” và bôi bẩn nguyên lý phi quyền chính vì dốt nát tối dạ.

Thật sự tác phẩm “cẩm nang” này, với nội dung gồm các trò xúi dục bạo động, gây rối trà trộn v.v mượn danh nghĩa phi quyền chính đối kháng chính phủ đã được bọn tập đoàn tư bản và an ninh chính phủ tung tiền in ấn tán phát và “xiển dương” qua một “tác giả” từng tự xưng phi quyền chính – trà trộn vào phong trào phản chiến thời chiến tranh Việt Nam 1969.  Và “cẩm nang” này được dùng nhu một vũ khí chiến tranh tâm lý (psyops)  gây ngộ nhận và bôi đen nguyên lý phi quyền chính như một nhóm phá phách gây rối bạo động

44 năm sau (2013), “tác giả của cẩm nang” này tự thú và tự lên án “cẩm nang” của mình là sai lầm và sai lạc!

Tuy nhiên, vấn đề cần suy ngẫm là tại sao trong 44 năm qua đó và cho đến nay, nó vẫn được “các nhà xuất bản” lẫn những kẻ lưu manh láu cá vặt vãnh tận dụng  đăng tải tán phát và mặc nhiên dùng danh xưng phi quyền chính ra vẻ như đây là một “phương pháp” được đồng thuận hành xử chung của “phi quyền chính”?

Quí độc giả tham khảo và tự qui kết vấn đề để tự cảnh giác!



Nguồn Tham Khảo

1-I wrote the Anarchist Cookbook in 1969. Now I see its premise as flawed
2-Anarchist Cookbook FAQ
3-FBI Files on Anarchist Cookbook

I wrote the Anarchist Cookbook in 1969. Now I see its premise as flawed 

‘The continued publication of the Cookbook serves no purpose other than a commercial one for the publisher.’ Photograph: Scott Olson/Getty Images

Forty-four years ago this month, in December 1969, I quit my job as a manager of a bookstore in New York City’s Greenwich Village and began to write the Anarchist Cookbook. My motivation at the time was simple; I was being actively pursued by the US military, who seemed single-mindedly determined to send me to fight, and possibly die, in Vietnam.
I wanted to publish something that would express my anger. It seems that I succeeded in ways that far exceeded what I imagined possible at the time. The Cookbook is still in print 40 years after publication, and I am told it has sold in excess of 2m copies.

I have never held the copyright, and so the decision to continue publishing it has been in the hands of the publisher.
I now find myself arguing for it to be quickly and quietly taken out of print. What has changed?
Unfortunately, the source of my anger in the late 60’s and early 70’s – unnecessary government-sanctioned violence – is still very much a feature of our world. The debacle of the US invasion of Iraq is yet another classic example. It still makes me very angry. So my change of heart has had less to do with external events than it does with an internal change.
Over the years, I have come to understand that the basic premise behind the Cookbook is profoundly flawed. The anger that motivated the writing of the Cookbook blinded me to the illogical notion that violence can be used to prevent violence. I had fallen for the same irrational pattern of thought that led to US military involvement in both Vietnam and Iraq. The irony is not lost on me.
To paraphrase Aristotle: it is easy to be angry. But to be angry with the right person, at the right time and to the right degree that is hard – that is the hallmark of a civilized person. Two years ago, I co-authored a book entitled Becoming an Emotionally Intelligent Teacher. Although written for educators, the book serves as an implicit refutation of the emotional immaturity of the Cookbook. The premise is that all learning takes place in a social context, and that teachers with a high degree of emotional intelligence construct relationships with students that enhance learning. I continue to work hard, in an Aristotelian sense, to be more civilized.
For the last 40 years, I have served as a teacher and school leader in Africa and Asia, working in some of the poorest and least developed countries of the world. Together with my wife, I have been involved in supporting schools around the world in becoming more inclusive of children with learning challenges. We have written books on the subject and speak regularly at international conferences. In 2010 we founded, together with other colleagues from international schools, the Next Frontier: Inclusion, a nonprofit organization dedicated to helping schools be more inclusive of children who learn differently – children with developmental delays, dyslexia, ADHD, and autism.
I suspect that these children have taught me a great deal more than I have taught them.
So what is the connection between the needs of these children with learning disabilities and my wish to see the Cookbook go out of print?
For one thing, children with learning challenges are often ostracized; sometimes informally by peers, sometimes more formally by schools that deny them admission, and sometimes by teachers who fail to understand their academic, social and emotional needs. No child should have to earn the right to belong.
The Cookbook has been found in the possession of alienated and disturbed young people who have launched attacks against classmates and teachers. I suspect that the perpetrators of these attacks did not feel much of a sense of belonging, and the Cookbook may have added to their sense of isolation.
Schools need to be safe places. Students and teachers need to feel physically and psychologically safe. Learning is greatly inhibited when fear pervades the schoolhouse. Learning is also greatly inhibited when children and young adults do not feel a sense of belonging.

I do not know the influence the book may have had on the thinking of the perpetrators of these attacks, but I cannot imagine that it was positive. The continued publication of the Cookbook serves no purpose other than a commercial one for the publisher. It should quickly and quietly go out of print.

Anarchist Cookbook FAQ

Summary: The Anarchist Cookbook is a book published in 1971, and you won’t find the real thing online, although it is easily purchased from your local bookstore or from amazon.com. There are various files available on the Internet that rip off the name “Anarchist Cookbook” and have somewhat similar content, but they are not the real Anarchist Cookbook. There are also other files that do contain parts of the content from The Anarchist Cookbook, often mixed with other material. The Anarchist Cookbook has a poor reputation for reliability and safety, and most of the online files are considerably worse.

NEW! Comments on the Anarchist Cookbook from the original author

Dear Mr. Shirriff, I have recently been made aware of several websites that focus on The Anarchist Cookbook. As the author of the original publication some 30 plus years ago, it is appropriate for me to comment. I would appreciate it if you would post these comments as part of your website on the Anarchist Cookbook. Please do not include my e-mail address. However, should you wish to confirm the authenticity of this message, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above address.
The Anarchist Cookbook was written during 1968 and part of 1969 soon after I graduated from high school. At the time, I was 19 years old and the Vietnam War and the so-called “counter culture movement” were at their height. I was involved in the anti-war movement and attended numerous peace rallies and demonstrations. The book, in many respects, was a misguided product of my adolescent anger at the prospect of being drafted and sent to Vietnam to fight in a war that I did not believe in.
I conducted the research for the manuscript on my own, primarily at the New York City Public Library. Most of the contents were gleaned from Military and Special Forces Manuals. I was not member of any radical group of either a left or right wing persuasion.
I submitted the manuscript directly to a number of publishers without the help or advice of an agent. Ultimately, it was accepted by Lyle Stuart Inc. and was published verbatim – without editing – in early 1970. Contrary to what is the normal custom, the copyright for the book was taken out in the name of the publisher rather than the author. I did not appreciate the significance of this at the time and would only come to understand it some years later when I requested that the book be taken out of print.
The central idea to the book was that violence is an acceptable means to bring about political change. I no longer agree with this.
Apparently in recent years, The Anarchist Cookbook has seen a number of ‘copy cat’ type publications, some with remarkably similar titles (Anarchist Cookbook II, III etc). I am not familiar with these publications and cannot comment upon them. I can say that the original Anarchist Cookbook has not been revised or updated in any way by me since it was first published.
During the years that followed its publication, I went to university, married, became a father and a teacher of adolescents. These developments had a profound moral and spiritual effect on me. I found that I no longer agreed with what I had written earlier and I was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the ideas that I had put my name to. In 1976 I became a confirmed Anglican Christian and shortly thereafter I wrote to Lyle Stuart Inc. explaining that I no longer held the views that were expressed in the book and requested that The Anarchist Cookbook be taken out of print. The response from the publisher was that the copyright was in his name and therefore such a decision was his to make – not the author’s. In the early 1980’s, the rights for the book were sold to another publisher. I have had no contact with that publisher (other than to request that the book be taken out of print) and I receive no royalties.
Unfortunately, the book continues to be in print and with the advent of the Internet several websites dealing with it have emerged. I want to state categorically that I am not in agreement with the contents of The Anarchist Cookbook and I would be very pleased (and relieved) to see its publication discontinued. I consider it to be a misguided and potentially dangerous publication which should be taken out of print.
William Powell

Mr. Powell’s comments have been discussed in Salon.
Note to reporters: I am no longer in contact with Mr. Powell; his email address no longer works.

What is the Anarchist Cookbook?

The Anarchist Cookbook, by William Powell, is a 160 page book, originally published in 1971 by Lyle Stuart. It is currently published by Barricade Books under ISBN 0-9623032-0-8. (Note that the name is not the “Anarchist’s Cookbook”; there is no possessive in the name.)
Some people consider the Anarchist Cookbook to be a classic while many people consider it total junk. Many anarchists say that the Anarchist Cookbook has nothing to do with “real anarchy.” The Anarchist Cookbook generally has a bad reputation.

Where can I get the real Anarchist Cookbook?

You can buy it from the online bookstore amazon.com. You can also easily order it (or any other book in print) from your local bookstore. Give them the ISBN above and you should get it in a few weeks. Alternatively, you can send $22 (includes postage) to Barricade Books, PO Box 1401, Secaucus NJ 07096. Other mail order places also sell it, such as Paladin Press.

Can I get the original Anarchist Cookbook off the net?

It’s easy to find files called the “Anarchist Cookbook” online, but I have never found the original despite extensive searching. If you find the real thing, feel free to send me a working path. Note that the original tells you how to make bail in New York City, provides a recipe for cacodyal, and explains how to demolish suspension bridges. If your file doesn’t have this, sorry, you haven’t found the real thing.

What files similar to the Anarchist Cookbook can I find online?

The Anarchist Cookbook V (the only thing in common with the original Anarchist Cookbook is the name). Also known as the BHU Pyrotechnics Cookbook; a superset of the Jolly Roger Cookbook: counterfeiting, lock picking, explosives, bombs, revenge, vandalism, hacking, killing, drugs. I’d have to classify this book as fictional; the author is apparently an antisocial high-school student making up most of this based on things he’s heard. It contains obviously unworkable explosive plans such as the auto exhaust flame thrower and the fertilizer bomb. This is one of the worst online books.
The Big Book of Mischief: explosives, propellants, bombs, ignition devices, firearms, rockets, cannons, pyrotechnics. Includes theory and safety information. This is one of the better online cookbooks I’ve seen (but I still wouldn’t make anything from it).
The Terrorist’s Handbook (Gunzenbomz): explosives, lock picking, ignition devices, projectiles, rockets, cannons, pyrotechnics. Doesn’t seem as good as The Big Book of Mischief.
Anarchy Cookbook aka the Anarchist’s Home Companion: “introduction to the anarchial arts, theft, destruction, weapons, explosives, pyrotechnics.” It has obvious ideas for the antisocial: spraypainting graffiti, bricks through windows, shoplifting, torturing cats; and the sort of explosives a teenager would invent after too many action movies: the “ammonia pellet” napalm bomb and the C-4 detonated by a mousetrap. This is another of the worst cookbooks.
Black Books aka Improvised Munitions Handbooks: improvised explosives, bombs, firearms, timers, etc. This is an online version of the US Army Technical Manual 31-210. You can get it in original book form with lots of diagrams for from various sources, such as Sierra Supply (303)-259-1822 or republished from amazon.com. On the positive side, these formulas are allegedly tested by the government, rather than invented by bored teenagers; on the negative side, since they are intended for improvised wartime use don’t be surprised if you blow yourself up. If you’re a crazed survivalist waiting to defend against invading Soviet tanks, this is the book to have.
You can use AltaVista or your favorite search engine to find these and other related files.

Is the Anarchist Cookbook safe and accurate?

No. According to people who know explosives, it contains many dangerous errors and formulas that are likely to hurt you. People strongly advise to stay away from it if you enjoy having your limbs.
If you want to read it just for entertainment or to impress friends with it, however, go ahead. I thought it was rather silly and contained a lot of tedious 60’s political rhetoric. I’d suggest saving your money, but buy it if you want.
Also note that kids regularly blind, maim, deafen, or kill themselves or their friends by playing around with pipe bombs and other explosives. Please avoid this, as it will not only mess up your life and upset your parents, but also motivates laws against the Internet and professional pyrotechnicians.
A few safety tips to think about: a) Constantly ask yourself: what would happen to me if this mixture blew up right_now, say from static electricity? b) Look at a .22 and consider that the fraction of a gram of gunpowder in this could kill you thousands of feet away. Admittedly a gun is a special case, but the point is that a little bit of explosive can fling deadly bits of metal long distances at you. c) You don’t need high explosives to hurt yourself; people get themselves killed with match heads, gasoline, or gunpowder.

Where can I get information on responsible pyrotechnics and explosives?

Check out the Pyrotechnics Guild International or look at the rec.pyrotechnics FAQ file, which, like most FAQ files, can be ftp’d from rtfm.mit.edu: ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/rec.pyrotechnics. Some of the books that FAQ recommends are Chemistry of Pyrotechnics and Explosives by John A. Conkling, Fireworks : The Art, Science, and Technique by Takeo Shimizu, Fireworks Principles and Practice by Ronald Lancaster, Pyrotechnics by George W. Weingart, and Chemistry of Powder and Explosives by Tenny Davis. Only the last two are books that you could actually afford.

I’m a journalist. Isn’t it terrible that people can get the Anarchist Cookbook over the net? Shouldn’t this be stopped?

Note that the Anarchist Cookbook is available from nearly any bookstore in the U.S. These dangerous institutions will also sell you Naziand hate literature, pornography, instructions on growing drugs, and so forth. For some reason, getting this stuff from a bookstore is not news, but getting it over the Internet is. Before calling for restrictions on the Internet, think of how you would like these restrictions to be applied to books, which really provide much more dangerous information than the Internet does. Some examples of easily-available books are Poor Man’s James Bond, Anarchist Handbook, A Do-it-yourself Submachine Gun, Home Workshop Explosives, Secrets of Methamphetamine Manufacture.
As an interesting Department of Justice report points out, over 50 publications describing the fabrication of explosives and destructive devices are listed in the Library of Congress and are available to any member of the public, as well as being easily available commercially. (Although all of the listed books have (coincidentally?) gone out of print recently.) The report points out that one Kansas bomber got his bomb plans from the August 1993 Reader’s Digest, of all places.

Does the Anarchist Cookbook really contain errors?

Yes. Lots of them. A classic error is the recipe for extracting the drug bananadine from banana peels. The flaw is that bananadine does not exist; it was mentioned in the March 1967 Berkeley Barb as a joke but the Anarchist Cookbook took it seriously. [Reference: “Storming Heaven: LSD and the American Dream, p. 336, thanks to Lamont Granquist.]
There are more inaccuracies in the demolition section. Most of this section was cribbed from the U.S. Army Field Manual 5-25 “Explosives and Demolitions”. However, the Cookbook discussion is simplified or even made up in several cases. For instance, while the Field Manual has a long discussion of the difficulty of demolishing suspension bridges, the Cookbook simply gives six places to put charges.
On the other hand, despite the errors the author of the original Anarchist Cookbook did use actual reference materials. This is in contrast to many of the online files, which get much of their content from pure imagination.
For a review with several specific errors, see the anarchistic publisher Spunk Press’s rather negative page on the Anarchist Cookbook: http://www.cwi.nl/~jack/spunk/cookbook.html .
Also see a review at http://hyperreal.com/drugs/faqs/FAQ-Clandestine-Chemistry that describes the Anarchist Cookbook as a flawed classic, full of all sorts of mistakes.
There’s a review by “Esperanza Godot”that discusses the political and safety errors in the Anarchist Cookbook.
For a detailed look at some errors, I have analyzed one paragraph from the Anarchist Cookbook:

“To conclude this chapter, I will present the most horrendous recipe I could find. Since it is not feasible to make napalm in your kitchen, you will have to be satisfied with cacodyal. This is made by chemically extracting all the oxygen from alcohol and then replacing it, under laboratory conditions, with metal arsenic. The formula for alcohol is C4H5O, whereas for cacodyal it is C4H5AR. Now, this new substance, cacodyal, possesses spontaneous inflammability, the moment it is exposed to the air. [Followed by a description of the deadly arsenic fumes it gives off]”

Now for a closer look at this paragraph: a) There isn’t actually a recipe described above, unless you consider “replace oxygen with arsenic” to be a recipe. It starts out telling you something to do in your kitchen and ends up with “in laboratory conditions.” b) The formula for alcohol is C2H6O (C2H5OH), not C4H5O. You can’t have C4H5O. c) The valence of oxygen is 2. The valence of arsenic is 3 or 5. Thus, simply replacing oxygen with arsenic isn’t possible. d) The symbol for arsenic is As, not AR. e) The Merck Index and the dictionary list cacodyl (notice the Cookbook’s misspelling) as As2(CH3)2. This formula is totally different from C4H5AR.
So, there are four obvious errors and a totally useless recipe in one short paragraph. I hope this brief review has pointed out the quality of the information in the Anarchist Cookbook.
(As a random aside, the early studies of cacodyl were done by Dr. Bunsen (of burner fame), who lost one eye and nearly died of arsenic poisoning in the process.)

Did the CIA sabotage the Anarchist Cookbook?

Some people claim that the CIA/FBI/author/whoever sabotaged the Anarchist Cookbook to blow up would-be anarchists or to make the recipes fail. However, there is little evidence to support this theory. I find it much more likely that the errors are just due to incompetence. Note that many of the above errors (e.g. wrong symbol for arsenic, wrong formula for alcohol) don’t sabotage anything but are just stupid errors. I would expect that if it were deliberately sabotaged, it wouldn’t have errors like these.

What was the author’s motivation?

I received the following long but interesting message:

I was Bill Powell’s roommate and close friend during the 60’s when Bill wrote the book. Bill and I were working for Bookmasters, an independent bookstore chain that is no longer in business. Bill was 19 when he wrote book. The idea of the Anarchist Cookbook was originally conceived as a series of recipes in the form of broadsides that would be pasted up all over Manhattan. Recipe #1 would be a how to for a molotov cocktail, #2 – how to make LSD, etc. The idea was never acted upon. It grew from discussions at the IWW headquarters in NYC (4th Street between C and D); this apartment also housed Resurgent Youth, and the League for Sexual Freedom. I lived there for several years before moving out and into an apartment on 10th Street between First and A with Bill.
He liked the idea and one day quit his job and started on the book. He got all his information from manuals at the public library and current magazines. Most of the stories and anecdotes were made up. Bill was never an Anarchist and had no philosophy. We had a few large arguments after I read the early drafts of the book.
At any rate he sent this out to every publisher he could find. The rejection slips were fascinating. Some were actually apologetic because they couldn’t publish the book. Lyle Stuart published the book for a number of reasons. At the time Librarians across the US were being intimidated by the FBI and CIA who wanted to get names of people checking out books they felt were subversive. Lyle Stuart felt that publishing this book would make those efforts meaningless since people could simply buy the book without signing for it. Anyway Lyle did publish the book.
In my opinion the event of publishing the book was important. The contents are garbage. This was a very dangerous and brave publishing act for the 1960’s.
Bill moved to Putney, VT, married, had a baby, divorced, became a right wing reactionary voice in the local college. He was in Alaska briefly working as a timekeeper in Valdez on the pipeline. I later heard that he was teaching English in Saudi Arabia.
The concept was Anarchism but the book is nihilism. He took the idea and assembled a book from other books. The rewrite consisted of replacing all photos and drawings from their sources with drawings and paraphrasing a lot of material. Lyle used it to negate FBI and CIA efforts to get names of book readers.

What is Anarchism?

“Real anarchists” tell me that the “Anarchist Cookbook” has nothing to do with anarchism. Anarchism is a movement for a radicaly democratic and libertarian society. “Defining Anarchism” says:

I must tell you, first of all, what anarchism is not. It is not bombs, disorder, or chaos. It is not robbery or murder. It is not a war of each against all. It is not a return to barbarianism or to the wild state of man. Anarchism is the very opposite of all that.

More information on anarchism is available at http://flag.blackened.net/liberty/defanar.html and in the Anarchist FAQ at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/1931
On the other hand, the interesting and somewhat academic book “Inside Terrorism” (first chapter here) describes the violent history of anarchism, and makes the interesting observation:

Much as the `information revolution’ of the late twentieth century is alleged to have made the means and methods of bomb-making and other types of terrorist activity more readily available via the Internet, on CD-ROM, and through ordinary libraries and bookstores, one of anarchism’s flourishing `cottage industries’ more than a century earlier was the widespread distribution of similar `how-to’ or DIY-type manuals and publications of violence and mayhem.

What is the point of this FAQ?

The goals of this FAQ are to provide a book review, to cut down on repetitive questions about the Anarchist Cookbook, to keep people from blowing themselves up, and to point out to journalists that books contain more dangerous information than the internet.

New! Generate your own random cookbook

Click here to generate a cookbook!


The Anarchist Cookbook describes activities which may be dangerous and illegal. In addition, the Anarchist Cookbook contains many dangerous errors. I strongly advise against performing any of these activities. I am serious about this. If you hurt yourself, don’t blame me. I have no connection with the Anarchist Cookbook. I am not engaged in any illegal activity, so BATF please don’t raid me. I would like to make it totally clear that I am not an anarchist. Also I do not advocate the overthrow of the U. S. Government by force, sabotage, violence, or terrorism.

Ken Shirriff: shirriff@eng.sun.com

This page: http://www.righto.com/anarchist-cookbook-faq.html
Copyright 2000 Ken Shirriff. Last updated 6/9/2001.