Giáo sư Antony Cyril Sutton và sự khám phá lý thú về Nguyên Lý NGHỊCH THUẪN của Lịch Sử Hegel (Hegelianism) trong nền chính trị toàn cầu gần 100 năm qua
Giáo sư Antony Cyril Sutton (14, Tháng 3-1925 – 17, Tháng Sáu- 2002) là tác giả của một loạt nghiên cứu kinh tế chính trị. Nổi tiếng nhất và gây tai tiếng tranh luận nhất là tài liệu tổng kết ông khám phá ra rằng chính phủ Mỹ, tài phiệt Mỹ đã cung cấp kỹ thuật tài chính cho cả Sô Viết lẫn Đức Quốc Xã trong thế chiến thứ 2. Chưa kể thế chiến thứ nhất và ngay cả cuộc chiến Âu Châu đều do các tay tập đoàn tài chính chủ động.
Một chi tiết thú vị nhất mà giáo sư Antony Cyril Sutton trình bày trong cuộc hội thảo tại California khi ông đang là thành viên nghiên cứu của viện nghiên cứu Hoover – Đại học Standford 1972, chính là tài phiệt Mỹ đã tài trợ kỹ thuật lẫn tài chính cho Sô Viết và Việt Cộng trong cuộc chiến Viêt Nam. Sự kiện này với tuyên bố khẳng định rằng “sự tranh chấp của cuộc chiến tranh lạnh chẳng phải để ngăn chặn làn sóng cộng sản, khi chính nhà nước và tài chính kỹ nghệ tại Mỹ cung cấp cho cả hai phe trong cuộc chiến Hàn Quốc (1950-53) và Việt Nam (1954-1975), với mục tiêu tạo ra những hợp đồng sản xuất vũ khí (military induatrial complex) cũng như mục tiêu tối hậu là kiểm soát thị trường toàn cầu qua phương pháp quây khu thị trường sản xuất (captive market) (the conflicts of the Cold War were “not fought to restrain communism”, since the United States, through financing the Soviet Union “directly or indirectly armed both sides in at least Korea and Vietnam”; rather, these wars were organised in order “to generate multibillion-dollar armaments contracts).
Sau loạt công bố này, ông bị cảnh cáo và khuyến cáo không được tiếp tục nghiên cứu lãnh vực này cũng như công bố những chi tiết liên quan. Nhưng ông vẫn tiếp tục và bị trục xuất khỏi viện Hoover đại học Stanford – California. Từ đó ông làm việc độc lập và tự xuất bản cũng như tự do trả lời các cuộc phỏng vấn, thuyết trình cho đến năm 1980. Sau đó ông lui vào ẩn dật và mất trong tình huống đầy ngờ vực năm 2002!
Các tác phẩm chính của Ông gồm:
- Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1917–1930 (1968)
- Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1930–1945 (1971)
- Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development: 1945–1965 (1973)
- National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union (1973)
- What Is Libertarianism? (1973)
- Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution (1974, 1999) (Online version) (Online Russian version)
- Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler (1976, 1999) (Online version)
- Wall Street and FDR (1976, 1999) (Online version)
- The War on Gold: How to Profit from the Gold Crisis (1977)
- Energy: The Created Crisis (1979)
- The Diamond Connection: A manual for investors (1979)
- Trilaterals Over Washington – Volume I (1979; with Patrick M. Wood)
- Trilaterals Over Washington – Volume II (1980; with Patrick M. Wood)
- Gold vs Paper: A cartoon history of inflation (1981)
- Investing in Platinum Metals (1982)
- Technological Treason: A catalog of U.S. firms with Soviet contracts, 1917–1982 (1982)
- America’s Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones (1983, 1986, 2002)
- How the Order Creates War and Revolution (1985) (Online Russian version)
- How the Order Controls Education (1985)
- The Best Enemy Money Can Buy (1986) (Online version)
- The Two Faces of George Bush (1988)
- The Federal Reserve Conspiracy (1995) (Online Russian version (as Vlast’ dollara))
- Trilaterals Over America (1995) (Online Russian version)
- Cold Fusion: Secret Energy Revolution (1997)
- Gold For Survival (1999)
Thú vị hơn hết vẫn là bàn tay của phố Wall cũng đã vươn đến Trung quốc khi Mao còn là một thầy giáo làng, và được chi nhánh đại học Yale tại Bắc Kinh ‘Yale in China’ ‘mời vào’ làm thành viên!. Trong tác phẩm “America’s Secret Establishment An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones”, G.S Sutton đã nhận định từ năm 1984, rằng:
“Trong vòng năm 2000, Trung Cộng sẽ trở thành một cường quốc được tạo dựng bằng kỹ thuật và kỹ năng của Mỹ” (By about the year 2000 Communist China will be a “superpower” built by American technology and skill.” Antony C. Sutton, American Secret Establishment published 1984 – America’s Secret Establishment
Tập Đoàn Âu Mỹ đã tìm cách phá kế hoạch phục hồi Trung Hoa của Tôn Dật Tiên, và thay vào đó là tạo dựng Mao và đảng Cộng Sản TQ, như đã từng giúp nhóm Do Thái chiếm khoảng trống trong cuộc cách mạng dân chủ tháng 3-1917 Nga để biến thành cuộc cách mạng tháng 10-1917 của Lenin và Trosky . Theo chủ ý của tập đoàn này, Tôn Dật Tiên chủ trương tân tiến hiện đại hóa và dân chủ hóa hóa Trung Hoa, như vậy Trung hoa sẽ thật sự tiến mạnh và sẽ đe dọa quyền lực chiến lược của họ. Họ tìm được nhân vật lý tưởng để xây dựng một Trung Hoa lạc hậu- đó là một kẻ bạo ngược bệnh hoạn -Mao Trạch Đông- đã được trợ giúp trở thành lãnh tụ: ((“MAO WAS A YALIE – Back in 1903, Yale Divinity School established a numberof schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as’Yale in China.’ It has since been shown that ‘Yale in China’ was anintelligence network whose purpose was to destroy the republican movementof Sun Yat-sen on behalf of the Anglo-American Establishment. TheAnglo-American “Establishment” hated Sun, because he wanted to developChina. On the other hand, they loved the Chinese communists because theyintended to keep China backward, and were committed to growing dope. One of’Yale in China’s’ most important students was Mao Zedong.)
Thật là thú vị khi có những tiết lộ lý thú này để phối kiểm với những gì SOPHIE QUINN-JUDGE truy cứu trong quyển sách “Hồ Chí Minh missing Year 1919-1941” củng như “sự trợ giúp đắc lực của Mỹ OSS cho nhóm Hồ Giáp trong suốt thời gian kháng Nhật và trong cuộc cướp chính quyền cũng như tuyên bố độc lập tại Ba Đình 1945 (Archimedes Patti). Chúng ta cũng đừng quên Ngô Đình Diệm được CIA Mỹ và nhóm Công Giáo quyền lực tại Mỹ (Hồng Y Francis Spellman) nuôi dưỡng và đưa về làm “lãnh tụ” miền Nam – với sự chỉ đạo và trợ giúp đắc lực của Edward Lansdale, người mà theo tác giả đại tá tình báo Fletcher Prouty, chính là kẻ thực hiện kế hoạch giết anh em Kennedy The Col. L. Fletcher Prouty The Secret Team
Nếu chúng ta hiểu về chủ thuyết Quyền lực Nhà nước tuyêt đối và nguyên lý vận hành lịch sử NGHỊCH THUẪN của Hegel (Hegelianism), sẽ chẳng còn ngạc nhiên về việc Tập Đoàn Nhà Nước Ẩn Tàng này luôn luôn TẠO MÂU THUẪN RỐI LOẠN, thiết lập nhân sự vào hai phía đối nghịch nhau, ủng hộ tài trợ hai phía kình chống nhau, sao cho việc xung đột nằm ở mức điều khiển được (manageable) cho mục tiêu khống trị toàn cầu của họ. Chiến cảnh này chắc chắn VƯỢT QUÁ KHẢ NĂNG TU DUY của đại đa số. Và đây chính là lợi điểm của “tập đoàn nhà nuốc ẩn tàng”! Và những người tìm ra được “manh mối” của họ, như Fletcher Prouty, Antony Sutton, Eustace Mullins v.v cần phải loại bỏ và triệt hạ với vũ khí “thuyết âm mưu” chụp lên đầu họ!
Chúng tôi sẽ cố gắng làm một biên khảo nhỏ về công trình của giáo sư Antony Cyril Sutton, khi có đủ thời gian điều kiện cho phép.
Mời quí độc giả tham khảo những buổi phỏng vấn của ông để tự tìm hiểu nắm trước một số vấn đề. Hoặc có nhã ý viết một tham khảo về lãnh vực này cống hiến quí độc giả Việt nam.
Chúng ta NGHE, không nhất thiết là ĐỒNG Ý, rồi NGHĨ, và đối chiếu với những sự kiện theo tầm kiến thức hiểu biết của mình, sau đó tự có kết luận riêng!
Không ai có khả năng thuyết phục bất cứ một ai. Mỗi người họ tự thuyết phục chính họ theo sự hiểu biết nhận thức họ có được qua từng thời kỳ mà thôi!
“tuệ nghiệp thị không”
G.S Antony Sutton thuyết trình về chiến lược tạo mẫu thuẫn miên tực của tập đoàn nhà nước ẩn tàng- từ cái gọi là cách mạng tháng 10 Nga 1917.
In Memoriam • Antony C. Sutton • 1925-2002
June 17, 2002, a sad day for one and all…
Eminent researcher, author and friend
Antony Sutton — Tony — has passed on.
I received a call from his partner of many years this morning at 5:30am. Tony had gotten up early as was his custom, Marlene heard some noise, went and found Tony on the floor and called paramedics, who pronounced him dead. When Marlene called me, she was waiting for the coroner and wondering what to do. So, she called me.
Tony was an amazing fellow. A person who wouldn’t “go along to get along.” He was a great man whom the establishment feared because of his principled research, lack of guile and his tenacity to the truth.
I met Tony in the pages of his books. Once I discovered Tony’s writings, I devoured every publication I could find. And finding his wasn’t easy. Tony’s books were never reviewed by the mainstream, they were conspicuously ignored. I mean, what could the powers-that-be do? Tony had their number and kept on following the trail. Tony was a private person, a recluse who didn’t bask in the limelight that his underground bestseller drew.
Tony wasn’t a “conspiracy” author, he was a technology researcher and journalist. Tony stumbled across some shenanigans whilst he was at the Hoover Institute studying the Soviet Union’s technological capabilities and discovered that there were high “unofficial” technological exchanges and the Soviets had western technology that officially they didn’t have and the fact that much of the Russian armaments used by the North Vietnamese against American boys, were built with help from the West. He kept following the trail. He wrote his explosive Wall Street series and then came the packet about Skull and Bones. He wrote a series of small books about Skull and Bones, he couldn’t get them printed here, so they were printed in Australia. Finally, a Mom & Pop print shop in Montana, said “what do ya mean, nobody will publish it?” And so Liberty House Press was formed and they printed Tony’s book for many years. It sold steady for many years without fanfare, but Tony had been hoping for more.
Here is an excerpt from Tony’s new preface from his most recent edition of his magnum opus: “America’s Secret Establishment has had little publicity, few reviews, ignored by mainline distributors, yet has sold steadily for the past 16 years at a rate of several hundred copies a month. This activity, in turn, has generated other articles and books by other authors. But my real intent, to generate an exploration of Hegelian influence in modern America, has not been fulfilled. In great part, this can be attributed to an educational system based on a statist-Hegelian philosophy, and which has already achieved the dumbing down of America. This disastrous, destructive philosophy, the source of both Naziism and Marxism, has infected and corrupted our constitutional republic. Much of the blame for this corruption is with an elitist group of Yalie Bonesmen. Their symbol of Skull and Bones and their Hegelian philosophy, say it all, although, with typical duplicity, they would have you believe otherwise. Hegelianism glorifies the State, the vehicle for the dissemination of statist and materialist ideas and policies in education, science, politics and economics.”
So, as a tribute to Tony, please let us begin to understand the reality of our situation and the Hegelian ploys used to keep our republic in chains of ignorance, greed and imbalance.
’Tis a sad day, but we who live by our actions may change the world for our children and their children.
Now is the time for all good men and women to come to the aid of their country.
PS: Yesterday, and for a while, I have been getting “friendly” calls telling me that Skull & Bones is dangerous group and that I should watch out.
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 13:58:46 -0400
Subject: great conspiracy literature
Subject: George H.W. Bush and the “frat” boys (fwd)
The January 26, 1990 issue of THE NEW FEDERALIST revealed even more about the Bush – one world connection. In his article, BUSH’S CHINA POLICY: SKULL AND BONES, Joseph Brewda writes:
“Jan 19 (EIRNS)–An obscure secret society known as “Skull and Bones” may
have more to do with George Bush’s obsessive support of Beijing’s mass
murderers than one may think.
“Skull and Bones is a secret fraternity at Yale University which is
restricted to a mere fifteen student members per year. The society was
formed in 1832 by General William Russell, whose shipping firm later
dominated the U.S. side of the China opium trade. Yale University was
founded by Eli Yale, who made his fortune working for the opium smuggling
British East India Company.
“Skull and Bones became the recruiting grounds and preserve of the most
important New England-centered families–families who also made their money
in the opium trade. These families, whose sons regularly join Skull and
Bones, include the little known, but powerful, Coffins, Sloanes, Tafts,
Bundys, Paynes, Whitneys. They are a dominant element of the U.S. ‘Eastern
Establishment’ to this day. The Bush family is one of a cluster of
lower-level Establishment families controlled by these interests.
“What has this to do with Bush policy towards China–or for that matter,
Bush’s “War on Drugs”? (Note: the last television news reporter to ask Bush
a critical question concerning the many narcotics agents who are
complaining about how bad the “drug war” was going, was promptly fired from
his job shortly after the press conference – Branton)
“George Bush, the first U.S. diplomatic representative to the People’s
Republic of China back in 1973, was a member of Skull and Bones. So were
his father, brother, son, uncle, nephew, and several cousins. Winston Lord,
the Reagan-Bush administration Ambassador to China was a member; so were
his father and several other relatives. James Lilley, the current
Ambassador to China, was a member of Skull and Bones, as was his brother.
Except during the Carter administration, every U.S. Ambassador to Beijing
since Kissinger’s deal with Mao Zedong was a member of the same tiny Yale
cult. A mere coincidence?
“MAO WAS A YALIE – Back in 1903, Yale Divinity School established a number
of schools and hospitals throughout China that were collectively known as
‘Yale in China.’ It has since been shown that ‘Yale in China’ was an
intelligence network whose purpose was to destroy the republican movement
of Sun Yat-sen on behalf of the Anglo-American Establishment. The
Anglo-American “Establishment” hated Sun, because he wanted to develop
China. On the other hand, they loved the Chinese communists because they
intended to keep China backward, and were committed to growing dope. One of
‘Yale in China’s’ most important students was Mao Zedong.
“During World War II, ‘Yale in China’ was a primary instrument used by the
U.S. Establishment and its Office of Strategic Services (OSS) to install
the Maoists into power. ‘Yale in China’ was run by OSS operative Reuben
Holden, the husband of Bush’s cousin, and also a member of Skull and Bones.
“The Maoists made China into the world’s largest opium producer.
“‘Yale in China’ was also closely associated with the New York-based Union
Theological Seminary, which has been a center for U.S. subversion of Asia
(literal wolves in sheeps clothing – Branton). Every prominent radical
leader operating in Korea today, for example, was trained at Union
Theological. Union Theological was dominated for twenty years by Henry
Sloane Coffin, a U.S. intelligence executive from the Sloane and Coffin
families. He was a Skull and Bones member as were a dozen of his relatives.
“Nor should it be forgotten that Averell Harriman, the former Ambassador to
Moscow who did so much to build up the Soviet Union, was a member of Skull
and Bones. Harriman was also a business partner of Prescott Bush, Sr., the
father of Maoist enthusiast George Bush.”
Note: This Skull and Bones – Communist connection is also confirmed by
geopolitical and economics researchers such as Dr. Antony Sutton (Sutton’s
books may be obtained through THE PATRIOT REVIEW., 33836 SE Kelso Rd. #6.,
P.O. Box 596., Boring, OR 97099; OR via THE MIDNIGHT MESSENGER., P.O. Box
472., Altadens, CA 91001). Not only did the Skull and Bones (Western
Illuminati) help to build up the Communist movement in China, but they gave
considerable financial aid to the Soviet Union communists as well.
According to Sutton, this power cult has for centuries been playing a “two
ends against the middle” type of game, attempting to control America (the
thesis) and Russia (the anti-thesis) and other countries or movements,
carefully pitting them against each other at the lower levels in order to
keep the populations of the world in a state of confusion and despair, to
the point that they will – hopefully – resign themselves into accepting the
New World Order “synthesis” as the only alternative to solve the very
“problems” which THEY, the New World Order initiators, created in the first
place! One startling, though documented, claim which Mr. Sutton makes is
that the Nazi Movement was largely financed by the Skull and Bones –
Illuminati as well. This connection was recently described in a mailer
describing Val Valerian’s book MATRIX III (c/o Leading Edge Research., P.O.
Box 481-MU58., Yelm, WASH 98597). Part of this mailer states:
“Interspaced with the material comes a host of data, supplementary
material, interviews, and revealing information. The ‘Final Scenario’ is
discussed relative to the New World Order and the plans for total economic
control, a one-world religion, and the electronic mind control objectives,
schools of thought, and research. MATRIX III brings out in detail how
various families in the United States and Europe are also involved in a
scenario which has as its main tenet the suppression and elimination of
human beings on many levels – a scenario which includes worldwide traffic
of drugs, vast laundering of drug money by national banks of several
countries, and assassination and murder. These are the people who arranged
and supported all the wars. There is discussion of the Bush family, and how
Prescott Bush assisted the finance and management of the Nazi empire – the
so-called Hitler project…”
Cult of the Serpent
(end of part 2)
Back To Secret Societies
‘Yale in China’ was run by OSS operative Reuben Holden, the husband of Bush’s cousin, and also a member of Skull and Bones. “The Maoists made China into the world’s largest opium producer.,
AMERICA’S SECRET ESTABLISHMENT — AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ORDER OF SKULL AND BONES
Memorandum Number Five: The New Dialectic — Angola And China
THE NECESSITY FOR A NEW DIALECTIC PROCESS
World War II was the culmination of the dialectic process created in the 1920s and 1930s. The clash between “left” and “right,” i.e., the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, led to creation of a synthesis — notably the United Nations, and a start towards regional groupings in — i.e. Common Market, COMECON, NATO, UNESCO, Warsaw Pact, SEATO, CENTO, and then the Trilateral Commission. A start towards New World Order.
World War II left The Order with the necessity to create a new dialectical situation to promote more conflict to achieve a higher level synthesis.
The source of the current process may be found in National Security Memorandum No. 68 of 1950, with its extraordinary omissions (analyzed in The Phoenix Letter, January 1984). NSC 68 opened up the road for Western technology to build a more advanced Soviet Union — which it did in the 1960s and 1970s with computerized space-age technology. At the same time NSC 68 presented the argument for massive expansion of U.S. defenses — on the grounds of a future Soviet threat. The omission in NSC 68 was quite elementary, i.e., that the Soviets could not progress without Western technology. NSC 68 allowed that technology transfer to go on. In other words, by allowing Western firms to expand the Soviet Union, NSC-68 also pari passu created the argument for a U.S. defense budget. We identified in our Phoenix Letter article the link between NSC-68 and The Order.
Unfortunately for The Order, but not surprisingly, given their limited perception of the world, the dialectic plan based on NSC-68 misfired. The principal devices used to control the dialectic process in the past two decades have been (a) information, (b) debt and (c) technology. These have become diluted over time. They just don’t work as well today as they did in the 1950s.
By and large, control of information has been successful. The intellectual world is still locked into a phony verbal battle between “left” and “right,” whereas the real struggle is the battle between individual freedom and the encroaching power of the absolute State. The Soviet Union, with its tight censorship, presents a strictly Marxist (i.e., “left”) orientation to its citizens. The enemy is always the “fascist” United States. The West is a little more complicated but not much more so. Quigley’s argument in Tragedy And Hope, that J.P. Morgan used financial power to control politics, has been extended to The Order’s control of information. In the West the choice is basically between a controlled “left-oriented” information and a controlled “right-oriented” information.  The conflict between the two controlled groups keeps an apparent informational conflict alive. Unwelcome facts that fall into neither camp are conveniently forgotten. Books that fall into neither camp can be effectively neutralized because they will incur the wrath of both “right” and “left”.
In brief, any publication which points up the fallacy of the Left-Right dichotomy is ignored … and citizens keep trooping down to the polling booths in the belief they have a “choice”.
The second control mechanism is debt. If Marxist countries have to import technology, they need to earn or borrow Western currencies to pay for it. Loans have to be repaid. So to some extent, debtors are under control of creditors, unless they default. Default is the weakness.
The third control mechanism is technology. If technology to advance to more efficient production levels has to be imported, then the recipient is always kept away from the “state of the art”. The weakness for The Order is that military technology does not require a market system.
The dialectic plan therefore misfired for several reasons. Firstly, the informational blackout has not been as successful as The Order expected. We shall describe later how control of Time and Newsweek gave The Order dominance over weekly news summaries. The TV networks have been able to orchestrate viewer reactions to some extent. For example, the three ABC blockbusters in 1983 were The Day After, Thornbirds, and Winds Of War, all with a common propaganda theme. But The Order was unable to restrict individuals and relatively small non-academic groups, almost always outside Universities, from exploring obvious inconsistencies in establishment propaganda. These groups often mistakenly termed “left” or “right” are outside the generally manipulated left-right spectrum.
Secondly, the debt weapon was over-used. Communist countries are now saturated with debt to Western bankers.
Thirdly, while technology is still a useful weapon, there are distinct stirrings among independent analysts of the danger posed for the Western world by building enemies.
Consequently, in today’s world we can identify two facts in construction of a new dialectic. First, cautious reinforcement of the Marxian arm (the thesis presented in Memorandum Three), i.e., Marxist Angola gets a green light, but a Marxist Grenada got a red light.
Second, the construction of a completely new arm, that of Communist China, itself Marxist, but with conflict potential for the Soviet Union. Major efforts by The Order are in progress, only partly revealed in the press, to create a new superpower in a conflict mode with the Soviet Union. This is the new antithesis, replacing Nazi Germany.
THE ORDER CREATES A MARXIST ANGOLA
Angola, a former Portuguese province on the southwest coast of Africa, is a contemporary example of continued, but more cautious, creation of the Marxist arm of the dialectic process.
The official establishment view of Angola is that Angola was a Portuguese colony and oppressive Portuguese rule led to an independence movement in which the Marxists won out over “democratic” forces.
This view cannot be supported. If the Portuguese were colonists in Angola, then so are the Boston Brahmins in Massachusetts. Luanda, the chief town in Angola, was settled by the Portuguese in 1575 — that’s half a century before the Pilgrims landed in Massachusetts. The indigenous population of Angola in 1575 was less than the Indian population of Massachusetts. Over three centuries the Portuguese treated Angola more as a province than as a colony, in contrast to British, French and Belgian colonial rule in Africa. So if Angola belonged to non-existent indigenous natives, then so does Massachusetts logically belong to American Indians.
In the early 1960s the United States was actively aiding the Marxist cause in Angola. This is clear from former Secretary of State Dean Acheson. The following extracts are from a memorandum recording a conversation between Dean Acheson (Scroll & Key), McGeorge Bundy The Order ’40), and President Kennedy dated April 2, 1962:
“He [Kennedy] then turned to the negotiations with Portugal over the Azores base. He said that not much seemed to be happening and that he would be grateful to have me take the matter over and see if something could be done. I asked him for permission to talk about the situation for a few minutes and said about the following: “The Portuguese were deeply offended at what they believed was the desertion of them by the United States, if not the actual alignment of the United States with their enemies. The problem, it seemed to me, lay not so much in negotiations with the Portuguese as in the determination of United States policy. The battle would be in Washington, rather than in Lisbon.”
Then Dean Acheson comments on a topic apparently already known to President Kennedy, that the United States was supporting the revolutionary movements in Angola:
“The President then asked me why I was so sure that there was no room for negotiations under the present conditions. I said that, as he perhaps knew, we had in fact been subsidizing Portugal’s enemies; and that they strongly suspected this, although they could not prove it. He said that the purpose of this was to try to keep the Angolan nationalist movement out of the hands of the communist Ghanians, etc., and keep it in the most moderate hands possible. I said that I quite understood this, but that it did not make what the Portuguese suspected any more palatable to them. We were also engaged in smuggling Angolese out of Angola and educating them in Lincoln College outside of Philadelphia in the most extreme nationalist views. Furthermore the head of this college had secretly and illegally entered Angola and on his return had engaged in violent anti-Portuguese propaganda. We voted in the United Nations for resolutions “condemning” Portugal for maintaining order in territory unquestionably under Portuguese sovereignty. I pointed out that the Portuguese were a proud people, especially sensitive because they had declined to such an impotent position after such a glorious history. They would rather proceed to the ruin of their empire in a dignified way, as they had in Goa, than be bought or wheedled into cooperating in their own destruction.”
There is an extremely important, although seemingly minor, point in President Kennedy’s comments. Kennedy apparently believed the U.S. was financing Nationalists, not Marxists, whereas the U.S. was actually aiding Marxists, as it was later to do in South Africa, following a pattern going back to the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. There is a point well worth following up in the Kennedy files, i.e., just how much Kennedy knew about CIA and State Department operations, where The Order was in control.
The Marxists under Neto’s MPLA obtained control of Angola. The Order with powerful allies among multinational corporations has exerted pressure on successive Administrations to keep Angola as a Cuban-Soviet base in Southern Africa.
Back in 1975 the U.S. in conjunction with South Africa did indeed make a military drive into Angola. At a crucial point, when South African forces could have reached Launda, the United States called off assistance. South Africa had no choice but to retreat. South Africa learned the hard way that the U.S. is only nominally anti-Marxist. In practice the U.S. did to South Africa what it had done many times before — the elite betrayed its anti-Marxist allies.
By the early 1980s The Order’s multinational friends came out of the woodwork while carefully coordinating public actions with Vice President Bush (The Order 1948). For example, in March 27, 1981, The Wall Street Journal ran a revealing article, including some nuggets of reality mingled with the Establishment line. This front page article viewed U.S. multinational support for the Angolan Marxists under the headline “Friendly Foe: companies urge U.S. to stay out of Angola, decline aid to rebels” (these rebels being anti-Marxist Savimbi’s UNITA forces aided by South Africa).
The leader of the pro-Marxist corporate forces in the U.S. is Melvin J. Hill, President of Gulf Oil Exploration & Production Company, a unit of Gulf Oil which operates Gulf Cabinda. This is a refinery complex in Angola, protected from Savimbi’s pro-Western rebels by Cubans and Angolan Marxist troops. Hill told the WSJ “Angola is a knowledgeable, understanding and reliable business partner.” Hill not only appeared before Congress with this pro-Marxist line, but met at least several times with then Vice President Bush.
PWJ Wood of Cities Service added more to the Gulf Oil mythology. Said Wood:
“The Angolans are more and more development oriented. They aren’t interested in politicizing central Africa on behalf of Cubans or the Soviet Union. Our people aren’t persona non grata in Angola.”
Hill and Wood, of course, are no more than public relations agents for Marxist Angola, although we understand they have not registered as foreign agents with the U.S. Department of Justice. Angola is very much a Cuban-Soviet base for the take-over of Southern Africa, yet 17 western oil companies and other firms are in Angola. They include Gulf, Texaco, Petrofina, Mobil, Cities Service, Marathon Oil and Union Texas Petroleum. Other firms include Allied Chemical, Boeing Aircraft, General Electric and Bechtel Corporation. It should be remembered that both Secretary of State Schultz and Secretary of Defense Weinberger are on loan from Bechtel Corporation.
Gulf Oil Corporation is controlled by the Mellon interests. The largest single shareholder of the outstanding shares. The Mellon Bank is represented on the Board of Gulf Oil by James Higgins, a Yale graduate but not, so far as we can determine, a member of The Order.
The next largest shareholder is the Mellon Family comprising the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Richard King Foundation, and the Sarah Scaife Foundation. This group, which thinks of itself as “conservative,” holds about 7 percent of the outstanding shares. Morgan Guaranty Trust (a name we have encountered before) holds 1.8 million shares or about 1 percent of the outstanding shares.
To a great extent these corporations with Angolan interests have themselves out on a limb. It is surprising, for example, that South Africa has not moved to take counter action against Angolan based firms, especially General Electric, Boeing, Morgan Guaranty Trust, Gulf Oil and Cities Service. After all, the South Africans are directly losing men from the massive support given to the Angolan Marxists by these firms. It would be cheaper in South African lives to direct retaliatory action against the corporations rather than against Cubans and Angolans.
After U.S. betrayal of South Africa in 1975, when South African forces could have reached Luanda, it is a tribute to South Africa’s caution that it has not used this rather obvious counter weapon. After all, a South African surgical strike on Cabinda would neatly remove the Angolans’ largest single source of foreign exchange, and give multinational Marxists a little food for thought. We are not, of course, recommending any such action, but it does remain an option open to South Africa. And the possible U.S. reaction? Well the State Department and CIA had best be ready with an explanation for the U.S. Embassy plane caught photographing South African military installations!
We cite the above only to demonstrate the dangerous nature of The Order’s conflict management scenarios.
III. THE ORDER BUILDS A NEW DIALECTIC ARM IN CHINA
Just as we found the Bush family involved with the early development of the Soviet Union, then with financing the Nazis, and vaguely behind the scenes in Angola, so we find a Bush active in construction of the new dialectic arm: Communist China.
In 1971 Mr. Nixon appointed George “Poppy” Bush (The Order 1948) as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, irrespective of the fact that Bush had no previous experience in diplomacy. As chief U.S. delegate, Bush had responsibility for defense against the Communist Chinese attack on the Republic of China, an original free enterprise member of the United Nations. With the vast power of the United States at his disposal, Bush failed miserably: the Republic was expelled from United Nations and Communist China took its seat. Shortly after that fiasco, Bush left United Nations to take over as Chairman of the Republican National Committee.
This is not the place to tell the whole story of American involvement in China. It began with Wall Street intervention into the Sun Yat Sen revolution of 1911 — a story not yet publicly recorded.
During World War II the United States helped the Chinese Communists into power. As one Chinese authority, Chin-tung Liang, has written about General Joseph W. Stilwell, the key U.S. representative in China from 1942 to 1944: “From the viewpoint of the struggle against Communism . . . [Stilwell] did a great disservice to China.” 
Yet Stilwell only reflected orders from Washington, from General George C. Marshall. And as Admiral Cooke stated to Congress, “… in 1946 General Marshall used the tactics of stoppage of ammunition to invisibly disarm the Chinese forces. 
But when we get to General Marshall we need to remember that in the U.S. the civilian branch has final authority in matters military and that gets us to then Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, Marshall’s superior and a member of The Order (1888). By an amazing coincidence, Stimson was also Secretary of War in 1911 — at the time of the Sun Yat Sen revolution.
The story of the betrayal of China and the role of The Order will have to await yet another volume. At this time we want only to record the decision to build Communist China as a new arm of the dialectic — a decision made under President Richard Nixon and placed into operation by Henry Kissinger (Chase Manhattan Bank) and George “Poppy” Bush (The Order).
As we go to press (early 1984) Bechtel Corporation has established a new company, Bechtel China, Inc., to handle development, engineering and construction contracts for the Chinese government. The new President of Bechtel China, Inc. is Sydney B. Ford, formerly marketing manager of Bechtel Civil & Minerals, Inc. Currently Bechtel is working on studies for the China National Coal Development Corporation and the China National Offshore Oil Corporation — both, of course, Chinese Communist organizations.
It appears that Bechtel is now to play a similar role to that of Detroit based Albert Kahn, Inc., the firm that in 1928 undertook initial studies and planning for the First Five Year Plan in the Soviet Union.
By about the year 2000 Communist China will be a “superpower” built by American technology and skill. It is presumably the intention of The Order to place this power in a conflict mode with the Soviet Union.
There is no doubt Bechtel will do its job. Former CIA Director Richard Helms works for Bechtel, so did Secretary of State George Shultz and Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger. That’s a powerful, influential combination, if any Washington planner concerned with national Security gets out of line sufficiently to protest.
Yet, The Order has probably again miscalculated. What will be Moscow’s reaction to this dialectic challenge? Even without traditional Russian paranoia they can be excused for feeling more than a little uneasy. And who is to say that the Chinese Communists will not make their peace with Moscow after 2000 and join forces to eliminate the super-super-power — the United States?
1. There are exceptions. Obviously Review Of The News, American Opinion and Reason are large outside the controlled right’ frame. To some extent the U.S. Labor Party is outside the left frame but includes so much spurious material that its publications are hardly worth reading. Henry George sit clear-cut left exception.
2. Chin-Tun Liang, General Stilwell In China, 1942-1944: The Full Story. St. John’s University, 1972, p. 12.
3. Ibid., p. 278